I can challenge the ruling. I have every right to challenge the ruling on a point of order.
I don't believe that it is appropriate and I don't believe we do have jurisdiction to make such a ruling, by adding words, on something for which we don't have a reference.
We could make such a decision through unanimous consent, through a suspension of our rules, but we do not have a reference here. The House of Commons has not given us jurisdiction over this at this point in time, and we don't know what the House of Commons will give us jurisdiction over or if they will give us anything.
Therefore, while we might be able to, on a consensus basis, set a path, I challenge the ruling that this revised motion is in order. It simply is not.