—whereas you're targeting money at places that need a lot of dollars to make a difference. I simply say that in passing.
One of the programs of the department that I have heard gets very high marks is the travelling exhibitions indemnification program. That is something museums appreciate. It makes a big difference. Most of them say it works very well. Certainly the bigger art galleries and so on say that.
I have heard, though, from some smaller ones that they have occasionally had challenges getting answers soon enough about whether their travelling exhibits will be insured. As a result, they've had to go out and get private insurance and then swap it out at the last minute, but that's still a cost to them.
Do you have any comment on that observation I've had people share with me?