There's that too, but in our case the government buys a site licence and they've.... We have no complaints with the federal government sending it around, but there is a government, a provincial government out there, that has one subscription, and yet we get many emails back complaining about things that may or may not have been in the coverage. Clearly, more than one is seeing it.
I could pull my hair out worrying about that. I would like to see stronger copyright measures, or if you opt for the side of funding, then only fund original content creators, and anyone who ventures into the aggregating role would not be eligible. You could do different things like that.