No, as part of the 2012 reforms, I argued and I would continue to argue that, if anything, we need to move towards more of a fair-use model—the U.S. model—by removing the limitations. We have a series of purposes within the act—limited currently to eight—such as news reporting, research, and review, and we should use those to say “purposes such as” so that we would potentially open the door to other uses.
The idea that we would legislatively try to roll back what the Supreme Court of Canada has said with regard to that balance strikes me as the wrong way to go. I think that would disadvantage not just education and the Canadian public but, quite frankly, some of the very same organizations that we're talking about here today. Their counterparts in places like the United States enjoy the flexibility of fair use. The idea that we would restrict some of those kinds of operational abilities, I think, would be very harmful.