I am going to change the subject completely and talk about copyright.
I know that it was not part of your mandate. You were not asked to deal with it within the framework of your mandate.
Do you not think that looking at the eventual impacts on copyright should have been part of your committee's mandate? Clearly, digital is devastating for communications in a number of sectors like journalism, culture, the arts, and so on.
First, do you think that you should have looked at it? Second, did you hear from groups who came with questions on the issue, despite the fact that it was not part of your mandate?