Mr. Chair, again, I have dealt with motions before. It would be a proper amendment to Ms. McPherson's original motion for me to suggest that Mr. Zuckerberg be added as a witness. There is no possible way that you would rule that was not a receivable amendment.
There was no time frame given for the original meeting date. I have seen many motions in the House of Commons where, when no time was given, we would instruct the chair as to when to call such a meeting—and that was a receivable motion.
I'm having difficulty understanding why these wouldn't be very normal amendments to a motion given at a committee. I find the ruling quite surprising.
Thank you, sir.