Sir, that's a very astute point, and I thank you for raising it. We agree with you, and we've heard the same criticism elsewhere, which is that Facebook is creating these rules and Facebook is deciding what stays up and what stays down.
To your point, sir, as you know, the only entity in a liberal democracy that has the legitimacy to make these rules is Parliament, which is in fact why—and here I would disagree with you, sir, respectfully, just a little—we welcome regulation.
When it comes to speech, you're right. We've been doing this for as long as Facebook has existed. The reason we're in the middle of it all is that for any decision we take about content, there will be people who say we took down too much and then there will be people who say we didn't take down enough. To do this in a way that is satisfying to a democracy is very much to have Parliament rule and draw those lines.
Obviously we've heard from representatives of the government that they will be pursuing this. Presumably this committee will be studying it and providing input, and we look forward to working collaboratively with you to share whatever experience and knowledge we have on this question that might be useful to the committee's deliberations.