Before I go to Mr. Housefather, I'm going to quickly explain why we do this.
The reason I start the debate by saying—and I've used this several times now—“due to a line conflict” is that if this line is amended in the bill itself, then the second one that's being debated is moot. It no longer amends the original one because that's now been changed.
The reason I point that out before the debate starts is to give you the opportunity to subamend to your own liking if you choose to do so.
You're on track, Mr. Champoux, about what you're talking about.
I'm going to go to Mr. Housefather now.