I appreciate that, Mr. Aitchison. I'm not trying to disagree with the content of what you're saying. However, the way to deal with this now, from the perspective of the Standing Orders, is that—as chair, I have to lay down the law—if you're proposing a change, we have to vote on Ms. Dabrusin's subamendment first. Once that is done, you may propose another subamendment, if you so desire.
We have to deal with the subamendment from Ms. Dabrusin first.
Is there any further discussion?
Seeing none, we call for a vote.
Shall the subamendment from Ms. Dabrusin carry?