Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I know I'm supposed to speak to Ms. Ien's subamendment, but I actually have a question, if it's okay.
I'm in agreement with what Mr. Champoux is trying to do with the new subparagraph 3(1)(q)(i).
I guess my real question for the department is that I'm not sure this amendment is in the right place in the act. Shouldn't these issues be dealt with under the order- and regulation-making powers of the commission, in which case, maybe Monsieur Champoux would be better placed to try to amend G-8 or G-9, which are coming up later?
If we wanted to achieve this, what would be the best place in the act to include, for example, proposed paragraph 3(1)(q) and proposed subparagraph 3(1)(q)(i)?