I think that point goes exactly to the trade risk point, which is imposing obligations.
I think, actually, that Mr. Champoux even, when he was speaking about it, spoke about “Canadian” versus “international” and about what we can impose on international actors, taking into account the trade obligations and good relations between countries.
That is the main piece that I would put to this, that even in his question he rather drew the distinction as to where that trade risk would lie.