I would like to understand what the difference is between the first vote, where unanimous consent was required for Ms. Dabrusin to ask to have her motion in amendment withdrawn, and the other process where she was able, without having to obtain unanimous consent, to not only withdraw her motion but to stop the whole process. Perhaps the clerk can explain that to me.
Perhaps I am not sufficiently versed in the rules, but with my rational mind as a math teacher and administrator, I can't figure out the sequence of events as far as our rules are concerned. I would like clarification, because from what I am hearing right now, I voted without knowing what the vote was on.