No. The way it works, Mr. Shields, is that we had to rule out number 3 as it was originally opposed. We need to have unanimous consent in order to reopen amendments that we have already dispensed with.
What I mentioned to Ms. McPherson is very simply that in order to do that, I have to ask that you adjourn this debate with a clarification or a qualifier that you will proceed to a unanimous consent. In other words, we're going to road-test this thing, go to unanimous consent and see if it is there.
If it is or if it isn't, we get to go back to Mr. Housefather's motion, which has been amended and now subamended.
I hope that's clear as mud.
That's the issue of unanimous consent. We have to exit, do it, and come back in.