You mentioning the CRTC a lot, but CRTC actors raised a red flag this morning because they feel that they're seeing a one-size-fits-all discourse in the public realm. These people, who were enforcing this legislation, say that it's not working.
Excuse me, I want to finish my comment because my next question is for another witness. I only have five minutes.
I want to show you that there are different discourses. These people have the right to speak, and they have the right to have a voice in the Canadian Parliament.
With that said, I will allow Dr. Geist to explain to us the difference between section 2.1 and section 4.1. The Minister keeps telling us that under section 2.1, everything is protected and user content will not be put at risk. At the same time, Mr. Trudel refers to section 4.1 as a source of confusion, saying that ultimately it should not have existed.
Dr. Geist, as a law professor and a great defender of freedom of expression, can you give us your perspective on that?