Mr. Trudel, I'm going to interrupt you because I want to bring you back to the issue you just raised, which is censorship.
Basically, the purpose of all of you being here today is to try to sweep this issue under the rug so that we can continue to do important work on this bill. I completely agree with you that it is absolutely necessary to protect culture. However, the fact that section 4.1 is no longer being created has raised concerns among some people and groups. Other amendments are coming, including section 2.1, which does not seem to be enough to convince people. Generally speaking, when you talk to us about Bill C-10, you see absolutely no risk to freedom of expression. However, let's suppose that, in an extrapolated scenario, the CRTC ends up making decisions that go against freedom of expression.
First, could such a scenario occur, and in what context? Second, what would be the remedies for it?
I think there are defence mechanisms, in all of this.