Okay, that's fine.
Yes, we did discuss that as well. However, the way we have to do this.... I have to have unanimous consent, first of all, to withdraw Mr. Champoux's subamendment. If he so desires, he can do it on two separate movements, as it were, two subamendments.
Just so that everyone is clear, there are two things we're trying to do here: change the word in one part and add proposed subsection 9.1(3.2) in the other, which was discussed.
That being said, Mr. Champoux, obviously, in order to proceed I have to have some permission from you. I'm jumping ahead of the queue—I apologize, Ms. Harder—but, Mr. Champoux, would you like to tell me very briefly whether that's how you'd like to proceed?