Thank you for the question, Mr. Shields. I interpret this as more of a precision.
Mr. Champoux, I don't intend to speak to the intent of your motion, so I'd be happy to have you explain this as well.
I see two aspects to this motion. One is about transparency for recommendation systems in general. The second is about transparency in how they relate specifically to Canadian programming, so understanding how Canadian programming fits within a broader recommendation scheme employed by the platform.