Thank you for your question, Mr. Rayes.
As initially proposed, section 4.1 excluded user-generated programming. As the committee members are aware, that section was replaced by a limited power granted to the CRTC under new section 9.1. We haven't yet addressed the issue as it relates to section 10.
Again, the power relating to discoverability applies to creators. The requirement applies to social media services, not to individuals. The regulatory power applies to social media, which could be required to promote creators further to a regulatory process. It does not have to do with promoting content. Again, the idea is to avoid having to determine what constitutes Canadian programming in the social media sphere. That is why the power granted to the CRTC under new section 9.1 really focuses on Canadian creators and artists.
I don't know whether that answers your question, Mr. Rayes. Mr. Manly raises a number of content-related points. Again, the amendment adopted by the committee is not meant to promote Canadian programming on social media; rather, it is meant to promote Canadian creators.