Just to recap what I indicated, the term being used by the amendment is “online undertaking”, which, as the committee is aware, is a definition provided for in the act that captures a variety of different online business models, including streaming services like Netflix, Crave TV or Spotify, as well as more distribution-type services, and one could think of the Amazon channels or comparable services as well as social media services.
With respect to the interplay with other provisions in the act, what I reminded the committee is that proposed subsection (2.1) is in the act, and what (2.1) says is that an unaffiliated user of a social media service is not to be considered a broadcaster for the purposes of the act. It doesn't matter how many subscribers they may have or how much revenue they earn from those activities; if they are using a social media service to carry out those activities, they are not considered a broadcaster for the purposes of the act. I was simply highlighting that the amendment on the table doesn't override or change that proposed subsection (2.1) and the exclusion provided in it.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.