I appreciate your explanation of that.
It is very concerning when we talk about the lack of thresholds. I think the reality of this amendment is that it tries to put in thresholds to actually give the CRTC some direction in the legislation rather than having it spend a lot of time in areas that may not be what was intended. That's what thresholds will do when they're provided in legislation.
Sure, if in the future they are found to be too high or too low, it's already been mentioned that in certain periods of time you review things and say they could be changed. As Mr. Rayes has said, maybe upwards is more likely. It is something that gives it a mark to go by. It's something that I think provides to boards and commissions—and I think they appreciate it—some direction rather than just a void and starting from nothing.
The real advantage of this piece of legislation is that it provides clarity in the public. It's in legislation. It's transparent so that the CRTC, as it follows this up, will be given much more clarity with regard to how to begin its work if this legislation is passed.
With that point stated, Mr. Chair, I thank you.