I hear what you're saying. The intention to set up a fund is noble. I understand that the fund does not exist yet. The CRTC will set it up with the powers it will have under this bill.
Having said that, you talk about groups or individuals representing interests. To me, that's the problem. What about a YouTuber, a Canadian who is not representing someone else's interests, but who, as an individual, might feel aggrieved and have some questions about it? There are thousands of individuals like that in this country. It might be a teacher, a citizen or a politician who has a large following and posts programs or content online. Ordinary people would not have access to the fund if they feel aggrieved, because they do not represent an interest group, they just represent themselves.
Am I mistaken?