Conceptually, what has happened with the education sector is that the lion's share of them have abandoned collective licensing in exchange for guidelines that are in fact not fair, in exchange for giving themselves the authority to copy without paying.
What would solve this would be to go back to collective licence and have an agreement whereby educational institutions can make copies of works in exchange for a payment. The collective licence provides access to a broad repertoire of work. It makes it easy for teachers and educators to pick up the book that's on their shelf to scan it, or the book that's in their computer and share a chapter of it with their students in exchange for a very reasonable payment.
I just want to highlight, because the cost to the education sector has been mentioned, that when you look at it relatively speaking, you'll see that the price of the licence is 0.0004% of the cost of education, whether it's at the K-12 level or at the post-secondary level. We are not talking about huge sums of money to the education sector, but they are sums that are absolutely meaningful and impactful to the writers and publishers of the content that is being copied without compensation.