It's very consistent. I think the only distinction is that there's a lot of attention here on the loss of traffic from Facebook when they moved early, frankly, to block all news.
I think it's important to say that news was struggling before Bill C-18 was passed or before Facebook pulled out. Traffic is down from Facebook and Meta across the board internationally. This notion or this myth that suddenly something happened because you passed Bill C-18, which isn't even in force yet, and that's the problem is kind of absurd when you look at and study the international news market.
I think you bravely passed legislation by looking at smart legislation elsewhere that is working. This is a short-term temper tantrum by Facebook, as was described. I think there are very consistent experiences.
A lot of the downstream harms that are being discussed today are also very consistent with what we see elsewhere. I would strongly encourage everyone to look at the state attorneys general lawsuit against Meta for underage children being harmed by their platforms. It's 40-plus state AGs. It's multi-party in the U.S.
Despite kind of looking at the U.S. and thinking that we can't agree on things, there's very clear agreement on the harm that's happening and that Instagram and Facebook are not taking care of their products.