I think it's interesting that you referred to that study, which is relatively recent. However, the figures cited are nothing like the ones that have been put forward since the study of this bill began. They're much higher than those that are supposed to correspond to the value of news on the platforms. That's particularly the case for Meta and Google. That sort of surprised me.
I heard you react on the subject in the media. In particular, you said that one should always take those studies with a grain of salt because the real figures are inaccessible. We lack the information to conduct an exact valuation.
Don't you get the impression that the strategy of these big companies is precisely to ensure that the actual figures don't get out? Then they can cover their tracks and make it hard to establish the amount of a fair and equitable fee.