The mandate of the commission is twofold. One is to dig in and to provide recommendations on actions that can be taken specific to safe sport. What can we do? What kinds of processes can we put in place to protect athletes when they disclose and to make sure the system supports them going through their healing journey? What is missing in the system?
Recognizing that safe sport permeates every aspect of the system, the other is a broader look at the sports system itself. Are there too many organizations with people wearing too many hats? I could give you a list of my own questions I would want answered if I were the commissioner, but fundamentally, it takes a broader review of the system.
Again, as I said, two reports will be produced publicly, with the information anonymized if that's what the witnesses want, and with a national summit in between to kind of raise the conversation again to the national level before recommendations are finalized.