The question you pose is a profound one, and I'm not sure that I can grow to the size and scope of it.
The question really is, what is the boundary between awful and lawful? There's a lot of crap on the Internet. There's a lot of misogyny, etc., but is that speech unlawful? Is it illegal? Should government be suppressing it?
I don't have all the answers on this, but certainly there's always a danger when we suppress speech—and particularly when government, which has an interest in how people speak and, particularly, speak about it, is empowered to suppress elements of speech—and that's regrettable.
It's a tremendously difficult balance to find, but it's a tremendously dangerous line on which government has to be respectful of rights.
Thank you.