Would it be fair to say that in part it's because you already have a process in place? You issue corrections. If something turns out to not be true, you have the CBC ombudsperson. Even the public, anybody...you don't have to have deep pockets and employ lawyers. You don't have to be a billionaire. If something is incorrect in CBC, you endeavour to correct it and make it right. This is something that my Conservative colleagues don't seem to understand about journalism.
Issuing a correction is actually a sign of strength in journalism, and the Fox disinformation network approach, where if you're a billionaire you can sue them and eventually get justice, is simply not a model that we should be using. Would you not say that the CBC has put into place a whole series of tools that somebody in my riding can use—