The act does cover the self-employed. I think what we're talking about here is precarious workers, gig economy workers. I'll give you the example of our directors. When they're hired by the NFB to direct a production, they are hired as contract workers. They are hired only for the purpose of fulfilling that task. So the contract, the engagement for that work, is subject to the act, while the contracts that cover all of the directors who do similar work for the National Film Board are negotiated collectively by the directors guild. So it's just to keep in mind that we are not talking about continuous employment and engagement.
Also, by the way, if you will permit me just a quick comment, in our last renewal with the National Film Board, we actually included a provision for TikTok videos. They are really short-form videos that are exhibited on platforms like TikTok. We call them TikTok videos for shorthand, but they could just as well be on YouTube. The NFB recognizes that this is short-form content so it clearly seems to recognize that the artists who are working on content that will be exhibited on those platforms are artists and are subject to the legislation provided that the employer—in this case it is the National Film Board, but if it were the CBC hiring someone at arm's length to do similar work, they would also be subject to it. I just don't want to make it—actually I'm trying to make it less complicated. We don't represent those artists, but in our view, those are creative artists and they certainly should be covered by the same protections that we provide for other artists.