Madam Chair, I told my colleague Mr. Champoux that we heard about the possibility of a carbon tax about 10 years ago.
The carbon tax in the other provinces and the Quebec carbon exchange are currently about the same. However, with the increase that will come into effect on April 1 and subsequent increases until 2030, the carbon tax in the other provinces will exceed the amount of the carbon exchange.
The Liberal government has made it clear that as soon as the tax exceeds the amount of the exchange—if it isn't adjusted—the increase will apply in Quebec at the same rate as in the other provinces. That means that Quebeckers will pay as much as the other provinces, either through a carbon tax, a carbon exchange or a mix of the two.
The collateral damage will affect all economic sectors and, inevitably, the economic sector related to arts and culture, including ticket sales. Quebec is a very large province. When you go to see a show in the regions, you have to get in your car and calculate gas costs, in addition to tickets and other expenses. People who tour also have gas costs. There is a multiplier effect in all areas of our society. Inevitably, that hurts culture.
This motion is really important. It would lower the cost of living across all economic sectors. It would also allow people to keep more money in their pockets. When they have more money, they can make choices. Cultural choice is inevitable, because Quebeckers love to go and see shows when they have the means to do so. They invest heavily in shows and culture when they can.
As you will understand, Madam Chair, the impact of the carbon tax, even though it doesn't currently apply in Quebec, will apply as a result of the increase on April 1 and subsequent increases, because the amount of the carbon exchange will reach $170 a tonne.
Thank you, Madam Chair.