Yes, I understand. That's why I've highlighted the amendment part.
Clearly, Madam Chair, the original motion dealt with the economic or managerial decisions that the CBC takes, and I don't see the role of the Minister of Heritage in the managerial or financial decisions being taken.
Clearly, the spirit of the original motion is with regard to the expenses and the spending of sums of money, which really have nothing to do with the mandate or the role of the Minister of Heritage. Therefore, I won't be voting in favour of including the Minister of Heritage.
With regard to the delay that my colleague has included in the motion, I agree with Monsieur Champoux. We can certainly come back from the constituency week and deal with this motion, unless there seems to be an urgency that it absolutely needs to be dealt with in the next two weeks.