Certainly, some of the other parts of the charter not currently included are covered by criminal legal aid. We are able to see development on the charter with respect to those areas.
Our emphasis is on provincial and territorial jurisdiction cases because, as I shared in my remarks, although cases such as the Andrews decision and the CCD case may not involve federal laws, policies or practices, the outcomes of those cases have impacts across the nation for public interest litigants, for the development of constitutional law, and for how constitutional law is interpreted and applied not just for one group but also for everyone.
It is very important that the question on the table considers the evolution of constitutional law, the impacts it has on many groups and the development of the law. These are very challenging and important questions. One constitutional decision can have an impact on many others with respect to remedies available and how systemic issues are approached.
It is therefore very important that the question of what cases are considered is one that takes into account broader implications, including how constitutional jurisprudence is going to advance.