I find what you are saying interesting.
I would connect it with what Mr. Serré said earlier when it was his turn to ask questions, when he was talking about the usefulness of this program, which made it possible, for example, to save Montfort Hospital in Ontario, and also the Université de l'Ontario français. It is not a bad program. It has its use. However, the way it is organized may make it easy, as you say, for it to be used by opponents of legislation enacted by Quebec's National Assembly, particularly those who take aim at protecting French and secularism.
I do not think this is an easy idea to apply, but earlier, one of the speakers proposed that there be representatives of political parties on the selection committee for members of the CCP's expert panels.
At first, I would have said spontaneously no, but I am thinking that this would allow for a kind of guard dog at the source, upstream, someone who could say that one or another case is flatly contrary to Quebec's values, or for any other reason, and it cannot be supported.
Do you think that could be a solution? If not, how could this program be supported, if we want to support it and at the same time also protect the values that Quebec espouses?