I don't have a specific number. If it's only using a quarter of its capacity, I'm wondering if they're not getting the cases that they feel are worthwhile or whether they're reserving funds for longer-term cases that might have to go all the way up to the Supreme Court. I don't know, but I certainly think it's important.
It behooves us as a government and it behooves Parliament to make sure that programs like this, and particularly this program, are well funded and that the mandates of the advisory committees are sufficient to do so.
I would like to see the scope of the Court Challenges Program enlarged beyond what it is. That's certainly not within the scope of a private member's bill, and it would require a royal recommendation. Taking too big a bite is often a mistake in private members' bills, so I'm looking just to make the thing permanent so that it's going to be difficult—not impossible, but certainly very difficult—for future governments of whatever description to get rid of it.