No, and I understand that, Mr. Chair, but there were other witnesses we wanted to question. To selectively bring one witness back—and Ms. Ashton makes a very good point—to bring back one witness so that we then have one witness...and then what are we going to do with the rest of this meeting? Are we going to go to clause-by-clause consideration? I'm not sure. What is the plan for the rest of the meeting? Are we going to end the meeting after that round?
On May 2nd, 2024. See this statement in context.