Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you to our witnesses for being here today. I do appreciate your being here.
I want to pick up from where I started last time when you were here, just to say that I did disagree with the current system that was in place to provide bonuses just because of the place the country is in. I did make reference to the fact that I didn't think it was aligned with where Canadians were. Having said that, though, I'm glad that the budget is providing more resources—if the budget is passed in Parliament—to mitigate some of the job losses that are there.
I said this before: I'm a big supporter of the CBC. I support the work that you do as an organization. I think it's an important thing for Canadians. It projects our values as Canadians. As a country.... It doesn't allow big corporate dollars to influence public news, which I think is a good thing. I also think that having a public broadcaster is good for democracy. So, I do appreciate the work that you do.
I think it's obvious from what we're seeing from the Conservatives.... Again, despite my objections to the bonus piece, I want to talk about the CBC as a whole. It's obvious that the Conservatives want to defund the CBC. There's more to these questions than just the bonuses. It's about defunding the CBC. The leader of the Conservatives and the members on the opposite side have said time after time that they would defund the organization. It's very clear. Their previous leader said the same thing. Canadians have to realize what's at play here when it comes to the constant attacks towards CBC, bonuses aside.
I wanted to say that because I think it's important for people to know that, despite the rhetoric that's coming from the table, there are many Canadians who support the CBC, so thank you for the work you do.
Now I think you have an opportunity in front of you to revisit, perhaps, bonus structures in the future. Do you think that there may be an opportunity in this June meeting, once the actual bonuses have been issued, to actually start a conversation about what that structure will look like the following fiscal year—so in 2024-25?