Evidence of meeting #118 for Canadian Heritage in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was cbcradio-canada.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Catherine Tait  President and Chief Executive Officer, CBC/Radio-Canada
Marco Dubé  Chief Transformation Officer and Executive Vice-President, People and Culture, CBC/Radio-Canada

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

You know what the recommendation is going forward to the board.

4:20 p.m.

President and Chief Executive Officer, CBC/Radio-Canada

Catherine Tait

I think I've repeated myself enough to say that these are matters that concern the organization that operates at arm's length, like all Crown corporations, and I have to be respectful—

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

You did confirm that you are the senior member of the management team which makes the decisions, and then those decisions get recommended to the—

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

You have 16 seconds.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

—board. You are a member of the board. Therefore, you have access to information to the points and access to the decision-making.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Taleeb Noormohamed Liberal Vancouver Granville, BC

On a point of order, Madam Chair, this question has been asked, I think, six times now.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

I was about to mention that I think the question has been clearly asked and the answers have been clearly given.

I think Mrs. Thomas has literally about two seconds left to finish.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Chair, I guess in response to the point of order, since you're ruling in favour of it, I just want to be sure then that no repeat questions are permitted at this table.

Is that the ruling of the Chair?

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

I don't think that was what the member suggested. I think he suggested that the question had been repeated over and over—

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Okay, so what is an appropriate number of times to repeat the question?

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

—and it was getting to be repetitious, because the question was the same and the answers were exactly the same.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Thank you.

On a point of order, Chair, I'm just looking for a ruling. What would be the number of times that would be appropriate to repeat a question?

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

There is no set number of times—

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Okay, thank you, Chair.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

—but as a chair—

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Thank you, Chair.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

—I may decide on how the meeting moves forward.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Thank you, Chair.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

Allow me to finish speaking, Mrs. Thomas.

Thank you.

I'll now go to the next person with the Liberals, and it's Patricia Lattanzio.

Ms. Lattanzio, you have six minutes, please.

May 7th, 2024 / 4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Patricia Lattanzio Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

Monsieur Dubé and Ms. Tait, welcome to our committee.

Ms. Tait, I'm going to read off part of the motion that was adopted by this committee to be able to undergo this study:

That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the Committee invite the CEO of CBC/Radio-Canada, Catherine Tait, to appear for no less than two hours on April 9th to answer questions concerning:

1. The increase in funding to the public broadcaster of nearly one hundred million dollars per year;

Can you tell us, Ms. Tait, what the nearly $100 million noted in this motion represents?

4:20 p.m.

President and Chief Executive Officer, CBC/Radio-Canada

Catherine Tait

This is the sum of money that was awarded in the main estimates, and it is from Treasury Board, a sum of money that corresponds to salary increases related to inflation. It's salary inflation funding, which all government departments and Crowns receive. It's not incremental new funding. This happens every two to three years.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Patricia Lattanzio Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

Would the sum of $100 million be consistent with past years?

4:20 p.m.

President and Chief Executive Officer, CBC/Radio-Canada

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Patricia Lattanzio Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

With regard to bonuses, I just want to have a clearer understanding.

In your opinion, is there a difference between the terms “bonus” and “performance pay”? Are they just the same or different? Is it that one just sounds fancier than the other?

Can you explain?

4:20 p.m.

President and Chief Executive Officer, CBC/Radio-Canada

Catherine Tait

Thank you for the question.

It has been a point of great frustration that this committee, or some members of this committee, refer to performance pay as a bonus. A bonus, in my mind, is something that is given out on a discretionary basis. Performance pay is a part of the total compensation of an individual that is contracted or agreed upon at the beginning of their employment.

If I could give a very mathematical example, if you are earning $80,000 and your performance pay is 10% of your $80,000, that means you're paid $72,000 until the end of year, when we review targets, key performance indicators and your performance, at which point you're paid out that amount of money.

In the current environment, pretty well all federal agencies, departments, Crown corporations and certainly the private sector use this performance pay as a way to incentivize and retain talent. If we were to eliminate performance pay at CBC/Radio-Canada, we would no longer be competitive in attracting talent to the organization, so it would create quite an obstacle for us.