Absolutely, that's correct.
That is already the current practice for the overview of cases that have been processed. Those cases are public in nature, of course. So it's the same principle. We simply want a list of those cases rather than an overview, and that list may only contain the cases that have already been made public. If memory serves, the Federal Court ruled on that in 2000. So we cannot deviate from that.
Cases that have been made public are therefore those that have been completed and are public in nature. We want them disclosed in a list rather than as part of an overview. I hope that answers your question.