I just want to make sure everything is clear.
If an organization decided to challenge a law or policy, and if it decided to take the matter to court using public funds, as the CCP provides, I don't think it should be up to that organization to decide whether it will remain anonymous or whether it will agree to the disclosure of the information. Correct me if I am wrong, but from my point of view that information automatically becomes public. In some cases, they are nonetheless challenging government legislation or policy.
I want to make sure the wording used in this subamendment or in the final version is clear and that no one is seeking access to sensitive information or prejudicing either of the parties.
Once the matter is decided, however, is there some reason to preserve the anonymity of the individuals or groups who used public funds to challenge a policy under this program?
I am trying to understand under what circumstances it would be warranted not to give broad public access to that information.