It's kind of you to offer me just over a minute to add something. It doesn't happen often, so I'm going to take advantage of your offer.
I'd like to go back to Mr. Noormohamed's question, because I sense an ideological opposition to the bill's underlying principle. When you stop and look closely at what Bill C‑354 really is, it's clear that it is neither a binding bill, nor one that negatively affects the rights of Quebec's anglophone minority, which is very well served, with its own broadcasting system, and lots radio stations and news media.
In short, it does not interfere in any way with this community. If it were to do so, I'd be interested in hearing about amendments to correct it, because that's not its purpose at all.
The impression I'm getting, then, is that the arguments against the bill are mainly ideological and coming from a specific faction of this caucus, but I'd like to reassure the members. It's not a separatist matter, but rather an effort to acknowledge the cultural distinctiveness of Quebec and the fact that broadcasting decisions have an impact on Quebec culture. The only objective is for the Quebec government to be consulted, in the form of being told that something is coming and being asked whether it has any comments.