That's a great question.
At least what I found was really good about the process was the sense that everyone had a different type of expertise and everyone could be on the same page of all wanting something to happen. I found that keeping to our confidentiality and keeping to our goals meant that the impact on me, at least, was that there's not just going to be this bill that takes care of this issue. In the brainstorming that we did together and in the brainstorming that's been done for whatever bill somebody's interested in here, that's not going to be the end of it.
One of the most important takeaways we need is to plant that seed with everyone: There will be other pieces of legislation that can be tweaked to match the purposes of what we're talking about right now. For example, I was inspired to think that, in particular, consumer protection law has been one of the greatest ways to have ideas of harm in one area be then even more refined in another piece of legislation.
In the spirit of realizing that something may not be in the perfect form that anybody and everybody wants in that group, the idea of slowing down is unthinkable. From my experience, it's given me at least way more recharge and hopeful creativity to see other pieces of legislation where this topic, which the purpose of this bill is to address, can be subsequently brought up. I'll give you one example: online harm that happens to children in some very distressful situations. Whether it's separating parents or brothers and sisters who are especially mean, there are things that can be done in family law in the future.
That idea of it is so cliché—that this is just the beginning—but one of the hopes I have is that everyone realizes that this is just the beginning, and this bill is not the end of it.