Thank you, Mr. Ripley.
I have one last question for you.
You have now told us that there's no real.... Again, I'm struggling with this, because I am trying to find a way to make sure that Monsieur Champoux feels confident that what is in place currently will work. You have now told us that we don't really need this bill to do the thing that the bill is trying to do. We also see tremendous risk in terms of potential influence on the CRTC if this is passed.
In a nutshell, I guess, as you look at the pros, and you have looked at the cons and the challenges here, objectively, what's the one thing you think we are missing in this conversation? What I am worried about is working on the back of assumptions, when you have given us every assurance that this is already what the CRTC is, and should be, doing and that there's nothing this bill does to improve on that. However, we are hearing considerable risk in respect of the independence of the CRTC.
What are some of the unintended consequences that we might be missing if this does get passed?