I gave you the example of a decision made by the Federal Court of Appeal last year. It admonished the CRTC, albeit very diplomatically, because, in its majority decision, the members said nothing about freedom of expression, and they actually required written apologies from the national broadcaster. A friend of the court was named to defend the CRTC's position. That friend of the court said it was obvious that the members had considered it because the dissenting members, for their part, made a big deal of it.
The Federal Court of Appeal replied that it was indeed shocking that the members had not mentioned it whereas the dissenting members, for their part, were concerned about the negative impact on journalistic freedom and independence. I think that any legislative measure should emphasize enshrining journalistic independence, which of course should not go unchecked either. Certain guidelines must be balanced, to be sure, but I think the CRTC should be required in its decisions to give priority to freedom of expression, freedom of the press and journalistic independence. That is not always the case, however.