Yes, and I think that it's always been hard when it comes to hate speech, because the tendency is for people to look at other values and say, “Oh, well, I approve of freedom of expression when it comes to what I think.”
I will say this: I think there are some significant problems with parts 2 and 3 in Bill C-63 that do need to be addressed. The definition of hate, though, does draw from Supreme Court jurisprudence. I'd encourage everyone to read the paragraphs, because the paragraphs are actually more thorough and do set out quite a high threshold.
Could there still be problems in interpretation and application? Absolutely, because it's so contextual, but it is drawing from case law, so it is drawing from a legal framework.