Yes, when it comes to the social media, I strongly recommend that social media be regulated.
However, let me be clear. There's content regulation whereby the state puts obligations on social media to act on specific content, like a individual post. That's much more complicated and tends to be more ineffective to deal with some of these problems.
That systemic approach I was talking about for Bill C-63 is crucial, and that is the approach being taken by other jurisdictions, like Europe, Australia and the U.K. There's now a global online harms network whereby they're basically trying to create coherence, because these are global companies.
The one thing I want to flag is that it's not necessarily going to address everything to do with something like falsity and some of the challenges we're facing when it comes to more of the misinformation and disinformation space. What is proposed in Canada addresses more the areas of hate speech, terrorist propaganda and incitement to violence. Europe has directly taken on misinformation and disinformation, like election information and discourse. That's really challenging to take on. The role of the government, in trying to improve the general health of the ecosystem in this murkier area, is much more risky and complicated.
I don't want to take up too much time, so I won't dive too deeply into that, but I want to flag that it wouldn't necessarily be solved.