The key similarity is a focus on risk management by social media companies, which, again, is a second-generation, best-in-class approach to addressing online harms and protecting freedom of expression. That's the approach in the EU and it's the approach in the U.K., Australia and Ireland. Other countries are following suit as well.
There are only a few types of content that require content removal and would have the greatest impact on freedom of expression, and I think we can all get around those: child sexual abuse materials and non-consensual disclosure of intimate images.
It's quite carefully thought out legislation. Again, I would make some amendments to it, but the structure is there.