I certainly think that the answer to that would be yes, at least from an investment perspective. In the case of Bill C-11, the way that the CRTC has begun to implement that law, with basic mandatory contributions, has increased prices for consumers, and we've seen some players who may look at the Canadian market and feel that the regulatory costs are too high.
On Bill C-18, I think it's even more significant, though, because if you lose one of your major distributors of your content or if there are no more links to your content through some of these larger platforms, it sends a signal that this is not a marketplace to invest in. We've seen that with some of the larger independent players. Village Media, for example, stopped entering into new Canadian markets for a period of time out of concern. The message that it sends to others who might want to enter into the marketplace by providing new, innovative news services is that this is a market where some of the regulations may inhibit the ability to have success in the marketplace.