Ms. Tait, I have one more question for you.
Since the beginning, it has seemed that the CBC is the only one that can do a lot of things in Canada. My answer has to be that actually, at least in the Conservative Party of Canada, we do want to preserve Radio-Canada. I have read the document you showed us earlier, which is evidence of the failure of the CBC.
I say that because if we look at the declining audience numbers, the total number of hours of television that people are no longer watching and the number of hours when people are using the social networks that the CBC has set up, we see that this is a failure, unfortunately.
As well, what we need in Quebec is a strong public television network because we are in a francophone society surrounded by anglophones. I was looking at daily viewing times, and they have declined much more on the anglophone side than on the francophone side. Radio-Canada's good ratings raise the CBC/Radio-Canada average and drive the CBC up. I also do not share your opinion that by cutting the CBC we would not be able to maintain the quality of Radio-Canada.
I think there are experts and people at Radio-Canada who are very good and are capable of protecting francophone culture. I applaud them because I actually do not think there is a television network in North America that is as successful as Radio-Canada in the public sector. That is very much to the credit of Radio-Canada. Unfortunately, what we see on the CBC side is the complete opposite.
Does making it so that Radio-Canada is unable to do its full part and investing so much public money on the CBC side not amount to dragging Radio-Canada down?