That's a difficult question, because we're not talking about the same environments, obviously.
What we're witnessing in the artistic field is perhaps a form of moralization or politicization of art. But this is nothing new. These are perfectly normal movements. It's a possible type of aesthetic.
If there's one place where freedom of expression can be found, it's in the creative world. I think that's where it's found in its maximum form.
Conversely, there are also difficulties on the other side, i.e., fears about forms of literary or artistic expression that may be transphobic or pedophilic, for example. This raises a number of questions. We no longer look at texts in the same way we did 20 or 30 years ago. From this point of view, we're seeing a mutation, and that seems normal to me.
That said, the question again arises from exchanges, for example, on texts of pedophilic inspiration. We then have to ask ourselves whether we're on the side of hatred or incitement to this kind of thing, which could legitimize prosecution or challenges.