You're referring to Bill 21 in Quebec. My view is that it was not a legitimate restriction of religious liberties. It didn't apply principally, as the witness mentioned, to Muslims, Jews and Sikhs. It actually applied to everybody. Christians have less prominent symbols, but it applied to everybody. I think, for example, the police force in Montreal, in the last few years, prohibited some of their presumably Catholic members from wearing a St. Michael emblem, or something like that.
I think you should be accommodating to people's religious expressions. There might be some things where, in very specific circumstances, there is a need for limitation, but I think that would be hard to imagine. It's certainly not on a general level. On limiting people's religious expression in terms of clothing, I am against that.