I think we're coming to the heart of the question that people have been raising at this session and in other sessions. It's about how do we agree to disagree or how do we have conversations. There is a legal framework for when speech crosses a boundary that we have all determined to be criminal, to incite hate, or speech that otherwise needs to be regulated.
For the most part, most people are aware and alive to the fact that speech can be, for example, hurtful but not necessarily hateful. It can be lawful but awful, right? That is something—